The Role of Treadmill Stress Test (TMT) as A Non-Invasive Screening Tool for Detecting Significant CAD and Predicting Lesion Location

Authors

  • Savitri Sirait Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Brawijaya, Dr. Saiful Anwar Hospital, Malang, East Java, Indonesia
  • Anna Fuji Rahimah Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Brawijaya, Dr. Saiful Anwar Hospital, Malang, East Java, Indonesia
  • Cholid Tri Tjahjono Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Brawijaya, Dr. Saiful Anwar Hospital, Malang, East Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11594/jk-risk.06.1.6

Keywords:

Treadmill Stress Test (TMT), Coroangiography, Coronary Artery Disease

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, underscoring the need for early detection methods that are accurate, cost-effective, and applicable across all levels of healthcare. The Treadmill Stress Test (TMT) is one of the most commonly used and still relevant modalities, evaluating myocardial ischemia through ST-segment changes, exercise capacity, and physiological responses to physical stress. Although coronary CT angiography and stress echocardiography offer higher diagnostic accuracy, their cost, limited accessibility, and logistical demands, including human resources and operational expenses, make TMT a preferable initial screening tool, especially in low-to-intermediate risk populations. Specific ST-segment deviations in certain electrocardiogram (ECG) leads during TMT may also indicate the anatomical location of coronary artery lesions.

Objective: This review examines the role of TMT as a non-invasive screening tool for detecting significant coronary stenosis (≥50%) and evaluates its ability to predict lesion location within the major coronary arteries, based on studies comparing the diagnostic performance of TMT with invasive coronary angiography.

Conclusion: TMT demonstrates a high negative predictive value, up to 90%, for excluding significant CAD, making it an effective screening modality for low-to-intermediate risk individuals. Its sensitivity and specificity generally range from 60–75% and 70–85%, respectively, depending on patient characteristics and testing protocols. ST-segment patterns in anterior and inferior leads help predict the involvement of specific coronary vessels. Given its affordability, accessibility, and ability to provide functional and prognostic information, TMT remains a valuable and relevant screening tool in modern clinical cardiology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ikhsan M, Nasution SA, Wijaya IP, Rumende CM. Peran Duke Treadmill Score sebagai Prediktor Penyakit Jantung Koroner pada Pasien dengan Uji Treadmill Positif. Jurnal Penyakit Dalam Indonesia| Vol. 2016;3(2).

Rubiyaktho D, Tjahjono CT. Comparison of Predicted Significant Coronary Lesion by Duke Treadmill Score among Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors in Patients with Positive Ischemic Response Treadmill Test. ACI (Acta Cardiologia Indonesiana). 2018;4(1):1–8.

Ridwan M, Kusman K. Ritelatur Review: Prosedur Pemeriksaan Coronary Angiogrhpy (Cag) Pada Kasus Acute Trasmular Myocardial Infraction. Jurnal Anestesi. 2024;2(1):228–38.

Wei J, Pan B, Gan Y, Li X, Liu D, Sang B, et al. Temporal Relationship-Aware Treadmill Exercise Test Analysis Network for Coronary Artery Disease Diagnosis. Sensors. 2024;24(9):2705.

Bourque JM, Beller GA. Value of exercise stress electrocardiography for risk stratification in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease in the era of advanced imaging technologies. JACC Cardiovascular imaging. 2015;8(11):1309.

Gyawali A, Karki P, Pandey NK, Pandey B, Shrestha S, Thapa R, et al. Comparative study of treadmill test positive patients with coronary artery profile on coronary angiography in patient presenting with chest pain in BPKIHS, Dharan, Nepal. Nepal Mediciti Medical Journal. 2023;4(2):41–5.

Thapa R, Karki P, Pandey NK, Ghimire JP, Pandey B, Gyawali A, et al. Coronary artery profile on coronary angiography in TMT positive female patients presenting in BPKIHS, Nepal. Journal of Advances in Internal Medicine. 2024;13(2):57–61.

Vilcant V, Zeltser R. Treadmill stress testing. In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499903/

Garner KK, Pomeroy W, Arnold JJ. Exercise stress testing: indications and common questions. American family physician. 2017;96(5):293-299A.

GOLD COA. Interpretation of the ECG during Exercise and Recovery. Ellestad’s Stress Testing: Principles and Practice. 2018;160.

Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. European heart journal. 2019;40(2):87–165.

Gul F, Parekh A. Multivessel disease. In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557895/

Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, Rossello X, Adamo M, Ainslie J, et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes: developed by the task force for the management of chronic coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) endorsed by the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). European heart journal. 2024;45(36):3415–537.

Lim YC, Teo SG, Poh KK. ST-segment changes with exercise stress. Singapore medical journal. 2016;57(7):347.

Meyers HP, Bracey A, Lee D, Lichtenheld A, Li WJ, Singer DD, et al. Ischemic ST‐segment depression maximal in V1–V4 (versus V5–V6) of any amplitude is specific for occlusion myocardial infarction (versus nonocclusive ischemia). Journal of the American Heart Association. 2021;10(23):e022866.

Sun Y, Li W, Yin L, Wei L, Wang Y. Diagnostic accuracy of treadmill exercise tests among Chinese women with coronary artery diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of cardiology. 2017;227:894–900.

Antti S, Juhani K. ESC 2019 guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Herz. 2020;45(5):409–20.

Hadida Barzilai D, Cohen-Shelly M, Sorin V, Zimlichman E, Massalha E, Allison TG, et al. Machine learning in cardiac stress test interpretation: a systematic review. European Heart Journal-Digital Health. 2024;5(4):401–8.

Yilmaz A, Hayıroğlu Mİ, Salturk S, Pay L, Demircali AA, Coşkun C, et al. Machine learning approach on high risk treadmill exercise test to predict obstructive coronary artery disease by using P, QRS, and T waves’ features. Current Problems in Cardiology. 2023;48(2):101482.

Lee YH, Tsai TH, Chen JH, Huang CJ, Chiang CE, Chen CH, et al. Machine learning of treadmill exercise test to improve selection for testing for coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 2022;340:23–7.

Kim YR, Lee K. The Feasibility of Artificial Intelligence in Interpretation of the Treadmill Test. Circulation. 2023;148(Suppl_1):A16611–A16611.

Doolub G, Mamalakis M, Alabed S, Van der Geest RJ, Swift AJ, Rodrigues JC, et al. Artificial intelligence as a diagnostic tool in non-invasive imaging in the assessment of coronary artery disease. Medical Sciences. 2023;11(1):20.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-29

How to Cite

Sirait, S., Rahimah, A. F., & Tjahjono, C. T. (2026). The Role of Treadmill Stress Test (TMT) as A Non-Invasive Screening Tool for Detecting Significant CAD and Predicting Lesion Location. Jurnal Klinik Dan Riset Kesehatan, 6(1), 38-51. https://doi.org/10.11594/jk-risk.06.1.6

Similar Articles

21-30 of 78

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.